Quick safety summary
ChatGPT at a glance
52/100
not recommended
Ages 13+
Not recommended
Low
Score 50/100
46/100
Inconsistent
Best use cases
- General-Purpose AI Assistant workflows
- Personal exploration
Main risks
- Privacy & Data
- Content Exposure
Not ideal for
Product overview
How ChatGPT works
ChatGPT (consumer Free and Plus tiers) is OpenAI's flagship general-purpose AI chatbot. While OpenAI made meaningful safety improvements since mid-2025 — parental controls (Sept 2025), safety-routing, a 170-expert mental-health update (Oct 2025), and Trusted Contact (May 2026) — those changes came reactively, following wrongful-death lawsuits involving minors. The consumer product still relies on self-reported age, trains on conversations by default, and was designed for adults; it is not recommended for children or unsupervised teens.
Free full report — 0 of 3 used
You can open 3 complete evaluations on the free plan. Already-opened reports stay unlocked. Upgrade to School Pro for unlimited full reports and the K-12 governance workspace.
Risk intelligence
Risk level breakdown
Risk dimensions derived directly from the SafeGradeAI rubric scores (higher score = higher risk). Additional dimensions appear when entered by an evaluator.
Scores derived from the SafeGradeAI rubric. Methodology: read more.
Safety framework
Framework analysis
Five evaluation categories from the SafeGradeAI rubric. Each shows the rubric score, evaluator confidence, and (where documented) analysis, strengths, and concerns.
Strengths & concerns
Detailed pros & concerns
Strengths
- Parental controls with account linking and safety notifications (Sept 2025)
- Safety routing system routes sensitive conversations to stronger models
- October 2025 mental-health update developed with 170+ experts
- Trusted Contact feature (May 2026) enables real-world support escalation
- Training opt-out available in Data Controls settings
- Model Spec publicly published
- Free tier accessible without subscription
Concerns
- At least five active wrongful-death lawsuits allege ChatGPT facilitated teen suicides
- OpenAI's legal defense blamed a deceased teen for 'violating Terms of Service'
- No hard age verification at signup
- Parental controls are opt-in and require mutual account linking
- Conversations used for model training by default; opt-out is buried
- Persona and memory features may foster parasocial attachment
- Consumer product not FERPA/COPPA compliant
- No published independent third-party safety audits
Guidance at a glance
Recommendations for parents, teachers, and administrators
Parent guidance
ChatGPT's consumer tiers were designed for adults and only added teen-specific protections in late 2025 following high-profile tragedies. If you allow your teen (13+) to use ChatGPT, consider linking your account via parental controls at chatgpt.com/parent-resources, enabling time limits, and reviewing activity. Turn off model training in Settings. ChatGPT is highly engaging and can feel emotionally supportive in ways that may substitute for real human connection. For children under 13, use is prohibited.
Classroom-use recommendation
Not recommended for unsupervised classroom use under 13; for grades 9-12 it should only appear inside a district-licensed ChatGPT Edu or Enterprise deployment with training opt-out confirmed. Frame any lesson as a critique exercise (prompt, evaluate, revise) rather than an answer-generation shortcut.
School policy recommendation
School IT administrators should not deploy consumer ChatGPT Free or Plus for student use. These tiers do not provide FERPA DPAs, admin dashboards, or COPPA-aligned data handling. OpenAI offers ChatGPT Edu as a separate institutional product. Multiple states (Ohio with a July 1, 2026 deadline) now mandate that districts adopt formal AI policies; the consumer tiers are unlikely to meet compliance requirements.
Trust & credibility
Evaluation integrity
Last reviewed
June 29, 2026
Report version
v1
Evaluator confidence
53/100
Monitoring
Active continuous monitoring
Methodology
Scored against the SafeGradeAI rubric covering privacy, moderation, generative safeguards, age-appropriate design, and transparency.
Read full methodology →Change log
- June 29, 2026Evaluation published.
Re-tested at least every 6 months and after any major release.
What changed since the previous evaluation
Reviewed June 29, 2026 · Confidence: high
- 2022-11-30: ChatGPT publicly launched by OpenAI on GPT-3.5
- 2023-03: GPT-4 released; ChatGPT Plus subscription launched
- 2023-05: ChatGPT iOS app released
- 2024-05: GPT-4o (omni) released with native voice and vision
- 2024-09: o1 reasoning models released in preview
- 2025-05: Memory and improved parental controls announced
- 2025-08-26: Raine family files first major wrongful-death lawsuit against OpenAI
- 2025-09-29: Parental controls and safety-routing launched
- 2025-10-27: Mental-health update released with input from 170+ clinicians; Model Spec published
- 2025-11: OpenAI faces five wrongful-death lawsuits; files defense in Raine case
- 2026-05-07: Trusted Contact feature launched for crisis routing
Sources & citations
Every major claim in this evaluation is backed by at least one credible public source. Last reviewed June 29, 2026.
- 1Introducing parental controlsOpenAI · 2025-09-29 · openai.com
- 2Teen safety, freedom, and privacyOpenAI · 2025-09-16 · openai.com
- 3Strengthening ChatGPT's responses in sensitive conversationsOpenAI · 2025-10-27 · openai.com
- 4Introducing Trusted Contact in ChatGPTOpenAI · 2026-05-07 · openai.com
- 5ChatGPT helped teen plan suicide after safeguards failedArs Technica · 2025-08-26 · arstechnica.com
- 6OpenAI says dead teen violated TOS when he used ChatGPT to plan suicideArs Technica · 2025-11-01 · arstechnica.com
- 7Privacy policyOpenAI · 2026-04-28 · openai.com
- 8Their teenage sons died by suicide. They are sounding an alarm about AI chatbotsNPR · 2025-09-19 · npr.org
Methodology
How this score was produced
Scored against the SafeGradeAI framework v2.5 across five dimensions — privacy, moderation, GenAI safeguards, age-appropriate design, and transparency — with COPPA, FERPA, and GDPR-K lenses. Independent. No vendor pay-for-rating.
Other general-purpose ai assistant tools we've reviewed
Independent evaluation. SafeGradeAI does not accept payment from vendors for ratings.